THE vast weapons testing site at Shoebury and Foulness should be considered for unlocking to help in the mission to build 23,500 new homes, a leading councillor has suggested.
Southend Tory leader Tony Cox is calling for a series of sites to be considered for development, including revisiting previous plans to build on part of Ministry of Defence site.
He spoke after 2.2 miles of greenbelt land was included in a consultation pinpointing where Southend Council can build enough homes to deliver a 23,500 homes target imposed by Government.
Senior council leaders said it is unlikely the MoD would give up the land, but Mr Cox insisted the site must be looked at, as well as the Seaway car park on the seafront.
He said: “I have a few different ideas. We could renew existing housing estates and rebuilding some of them like we are with the Queensway project, it’s not unheard of.
“I also think the Ministry of Defence land is an option too – industrial sites like this could be moved to the edge of the town to free up space for homes.
“A lot of the site in Shoebury is not in use and I believe it could work for new homes, and its not used for everything that it used to be so would work well.
“I also think we need to use sites such as the Seaway car park which could have two levels of parking and homes above it too. We are not considering all the options.”
In 2006, 2,000 homes were proposed for the vast swathes of land around the Shoebury ranges. The idea of a new mini-town was resurrected in 2013 but the MoD was not keen to give up the land.
Ron Woodley, deputy leader of the council, said: “Much of Foulness is in Rochford district, but we do have MoD land in Shoebury, though you would still have traffic problems. That’s why we need a tram system.
“I don’t think the MoD wanted to give up the land. We could go to them about releasing the land but we can’t force them. The Government says build homes and then you have a ministry saying it won’t let us have the land.
“We have got to plough on without touching green belt at Bournes Green Chase because that is a buffer between Southend and Rochford.”
The Government could help Southend meet its new homes target by giving up some Mod land at Shoebury, it has been suggested.
Last week Southend Conservative group leader suggested the council should look to build on land in Shoebury currently owned by the ministry of defence.
It came as 2.2 miles of green belt land was included in a consultation on where Southend Council can build enough homes to deliver a 23,500 homes target imposed by Government.
It is not the first time the vast swathes of land around Shoebury ranges could be put to use for homes.
The idea of a new mini-town at the weapons testing base was suggested many years ago and resurrected in 2013.
In 2006, proposals for 2,000 new homes on the New Ranges, between Shoebury and Foulness Island, were put forward, but fell through after the MoD said it needed the land after all.
In 2013 a scheme, called One Public Estate, looked at ways councils and government departments could share or sell property they don’t need, in an effort to boost economic growth.
At the time the Government said the MoD land in Shoebury would be explored for housing development.
The scheme never saw the light of day as Mod reluctance to give up the land continued and amid fears there was insufficient infrastructure to cope with thousands of new homes.
Ron Woodley, deputy leader of the council, said the Government should help deliver the target it had set the borough.
He said: “Much of Foulness is in Rochford District but we do have MoD land in Shoebury through you would still have traffic problems. That’s why we need a tram system.
“I don’t think the MoD wanted to give up the land. We could go to them about releasing the land but we can’t force them. The Government says build homes and then you have a ministry saying it won’t let us have the land for housing.”
Mr Woodley added: “We have got to plough on with what we can build without touching green belt at Bournes Green Chase because that is a buffer between Southend and Rochford.”
Carol Mulroney, councillor responsible for Environment, Culture, Tourism and Planning, said: “As far as I am aware no one has approached the MoD and they haven’t approached us. It’s certainly not something that has come up but if Mr Cox wants to put forward that option he is free to do so.
“We need to look at all sites. The inspector will look at the Southend appraisal and will say have you considered every option to fulfill your housing need? We can say we have rejected it for this or that reason but we can’t say we didn’t look at it because we didn’t want it. He will just say you haven’t explored all the possibilities.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel