A BID to halt the introduction of parking charges in the city’s parks has been backed by a majority of councillors - but could leave a hole in Southend Council’s budget.
Conservatives put forward a motion to abolish the unpopular proposals to charge people to park in hitherto free car parks. Critics say the move will hit residents, particularly the elderly, who use them for recreation and health activities.
The charges would impact Big Gunners and Little Gunners Park in Shoebury and Jones Memorial Ground in Southend from 2023/24, and Leigh’s Belfairs Park, Priory Park in Southend, and Chalkwell Park from 2024/25.
Tories won a vote 23 to nine at Thursdays’ council meeting and the charges will now be referred to cabinet to be reconsidered after the election.
- READ MORE:
- CCTV van set to hit Southend streets ahead of tough new rules in city
- Southend High Street set to be transformed into green oasis this summer
Tony Cox, leader of the Conservative Group, said: “A lot of the abstentions came from the administration who only a few weeks ago voted to introduce those charges. It’s a massive issue. People feel strongly about it.
“If there is a Conservative administration after May 4 we will uphold the result in full.
”The amount of money is peanuts. I believe by increasing parking spaces which we’ve already done some preliminary work on, could offset those charges easily.”
Peter Lovett, vice-chairman of Shoebury Residents Association welcomed the motion.
He said: “Anything that stops them charging for parking in car parks has got to be good news. People from deprived areas take their kids over to these parks because they can’t afford anything else so charging is absolutely ridiculous.”
Council leader Stephen George said the only alternative to raising revenue was to cut services.
He added: “Whilst the proposal does not impact on the balanced budget set for 2023/24 it does create an additional £50,000 gap in the medium-term financial plan from 2024/ 25onwards.
“It will create and estimated £18,500 loss of income per annum and an unbalanced budget for 2023/24. I personally feel it is irresponsible of the opposition to propose a measure that will have a financial impact without stating where or how this will be met.”
Get more great stories like this delivered to your inbox every day by signing up to our morning newsletter - don't miss out!
There were ten abstentions from the vote, including the council’s deputy leader Martin Terry; Ian Wakefield, councillor responsible for traffic, parking and highways who actually introduced the charges in the council’s budget; and Carole Mulroney, councillor responsible for environment.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel